Saturday, October 2, 2010

COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky v. Elizabeth BRANDENBURG

114 S.W.3d 830 (Ky. 2003)


COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellant,

v.

Elizabeth BRANDENBURG, Appellee.

No. 2001-SC-0722-DG.

Supreme Court of Kentucky

Sept. 18, 2003.

Page 831


"A fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. To this end no man can be a judge in his own case and no man is permitted to try cases where he has an interest in the outcome. That interest cannot be defined with precision. Circumstances and relationships must be considered. This Court has said, however, that 'every procedure which would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judge ... not to hold the balance nice, clear, and true between the State and the accused den the latter due process of law.' Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 532, 47 S.Ct. 437, 71 L.Ed. 749. Such a stringent rule may sometimes bar trial by judges who have no actual bias and who would do their very best to weigh the scales of justice equally between contending parties. But to perform its high function in the best way 'justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.' Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 99 L.Ed. 11."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your interest. James Duvall, M. A.